An odd promise from a software company. It is also the entire point.
Simplefysed Solutions is a German software and AI engineering company built on one observation: companies rarely suffer from too little software. They suffer from too much of it. Three productized solutions carry every engagement, each one leaving you with fewer moving parts than you started with.
You will always talk to Vin. The rest prefer the workshop.
I take software apart for a living. Before I write a single line, I want to know why the current system deserves to exist. Most of the time, nobody can tell me. That answer, or the silence where it should be, is where every Simplefysed project begins.
The habit started with an inbox. A French hotel evaluation firm was spending fifteen to twenty minutes on every inquiry email, hundreds of times a month: reading, sorting, copy-pasting into Word templates. Everyone assumed they needed better software. They didn’t. Six of the steps didn’t need software at all. They needed to stop existing. We removed them, automated what remained, and the documents now write themselves in seconds. The team reviews finished work instead of producing it.
That project settled the rule the whole company runs on: understand the process before you touch a tool. A rule like that decides who does the work. Understanding does not delegate. I could have grown a normal agency around it. Hire juniors, sell hours, put an account manager between you and the code. I chose not to, and that choice costs me revenue every month. Simplefysed stays deliberately small: three productized solutions, fixed scope, and a team you can count on one hand. Two or three specialists build behind the scenes. I carry every project from the first call to production, and I stay the one person you deal with.
You are right to wonder what you lose with a team this small. Small does not mean narrow. MandateOS, my campaign operating system for German elections, is one product across three clients on a single backend: a web command center for campaign leadership, and native iOS and Android apps for volunteers in the field, all of it under German party-finance and data-protection law. I built and shipped all three myself. And small does not mean behind. I run open-source models on my own GPU, install the frameworks the week they release, and test them against my own workflows first. You get the state of the art after it has survived my desk.
So here is the honest filter. If you want a vendor that disappears behind a ticket system, we will frustrate you. If you want the person who understood your problem to be the person who solves it, that is not a feature of this company. It is the company.
Most process pages draw circles and arrows. Ours reads left to right, and at every gate you can leave with everything made so far. Nobody stays because leaving is hard.
We watch how work actually moves. Every workflow, every handoff, every place a task waits for a human to remember it. The firm that asked us for better templates learned six of its steps should not exist at all.
A findings memo and a target process design.
The surviving process gets its architecture: fewer steps, fewer tools, clear owners, and the exact seams where software takes over. Scope is fixed here. So is the price.
Architecture with a fixed scope and a fixed price.
Weekly increments you can click, in your repository from day one. No status theatre, no slide decks standing in for progress. MandateOS grew from an empty repository to mandateos.de on exactly this cadence, one working release at a time.
Working software every week.
Handover is engineered like a feature: documentation written for the next engineer, infrastructure on your accounts, every deployed agent logged, exceptions escalated to a human instead of failing silently.
A system your team owns and operates.
Everything we build runs under one of three arrangements. The build is the same. What changes is whose accounts it lives on, and who keeps it running.
We host it, we run it, we watch it. Your automations, software, and databases live on our infrastructure for a flat monthly retainer, with error monitoring that catches failures before you would notice them. You get results as a service, and the fastest go-live of the three.
We build it and run it first. Once the system is proven in production, we migrate the entire workload onto your systems, with the transfer scoped from the start and documentation written for the next engineer.
Built on your accounts from the first commit. Your cloud, your automations, your code, your data. We work as contributors in a house you already own.
Every arrangement ships handover-ready. A becomes B whenever you ask, and you leave with everything.
Six questions from real first calls, answered in writing you can forward. Verdict first, mechanism after.
Vin, with a small team behind him. The founder is your single point of contact and stays in your codebase from kickoff to handover, while two to three specialists carry workstreams behind the scenes. Nothing is resold, and nothing is handed off to a junior team once the contract is signed. The person who scoped your project is the person accountable for shipping it.
A fixed price on a fixed scope. Every project runs through one of three productized solutions, so the first call ends with a recommendation, a plan, and a price. No hourly guesswork and no surprise invoices. If we also host and run the system for you, that part is a flat monthly retainer. And if the audit shows the numbers will not pay for themselves, we say so and stop there.
A human sees it. Every agent we deploy runs logged, and every exception escalates to a person instead of failing silently. Across our client base, 3,876 tasks a month run under that rule. The machines carry the recurring work; the judgment stays with your team.
Wherever the law and your policies require, which for most of our clients means the EU. We are a German company and build to German standards by default: GDPR compliance, double opt-in, access scoped to only the systems we touch, and data processing agreements handled at setup, not as an afterthought.
You lose a phone number, not a system. The code sits in your repository from day one, the infrastructure runs on your accounts, and every project ships with documentation written for the next engineer. Lock-in is a business model. It is not ours.
Yes, and it is often the recommendation. AI Augmentation, one of our three solutions, builds on top of your existing stack: add-ons, integrations, and embedded assistants. Zero systems replaced and zero new tools for your team to learn. Rebuilds are reserved for the cases where the audit proves nothing else will hold.
Next Step
Bring the process that hurts the most. Thirty minutes later you will know what we would build, what it would cost, and whether it is worth doing.
Simplefysed Solutions · Germany
